DEATH
Death is a phase in the cycle of transitions of soul. Particular time of death is associated with the timing for opening the doorway to complete the transition. This transitions could occur naturally or could be caused by impositions i.e accidents, acts of violence. The external actions causes disruption in the flow of energy within the chain of life support system of the body. To make it more descriptive. The living body is composed of living cells. The word 'living' itself designates a force --- understandably known as life force. All life force of each cell combining together through the the chain of connectivity of each cell. This flow generates enough energy to encompass life support system for the body. This is commonly known as soul or may be just life support system of the physical body.
Ferdous H Khan
Sunday, August 03, 2008
Tuesday, July 04, 2006
FREEDOM
Ferdous H Khan
Humans are born free. They always have the desire to live life as it unfolds. The norms and customs of society and bindings and obligations of religion appear as mechanism to bind and restrict them to some sort of duties. They feel that such desire of absolute freedom does not exist. Freedom of society, race or group of people is dependent on the interest of a group who governs. Total society has to bend and obey those rules shaming the name and concept of freedom. Therefore, to look for freedom is blunder. In time and ages such thoughts must have evolved and died. Tried and failed ---- the civilization must have given these thoughts an opportunity but have failed. Humans are stuck with the monster that they created -- FREEDOM
Ferdous H Khan
Humans are born free. They always have the desire to live life as it unfolds. The norms and customs of society and bindings and obligations of religion appear as mechanism to bind and restrict them to some sort of duties. They feel that such desire of absolute freedom does not exist. Freedom of society, race or group of people is dependent on the interest of a group who governs. Total society has to bend and obey those rules shaming the name and concept of freedom. Therefore, to look for freedom is blunder. In time and ages such thoughts must have evolved and died. Tried and failed ---- the civilization must have given these thoughts an opportunity but have failed. Humans are stuck with the monster that they created -- FREEDOM
Friday, June 09, 2006
SIMPLY SIMPLE
Simply Simple!
Ferdous H Khan
Simply simple-----could be heard amongst researchers on a project, students on coming examination, soldiers before the battle, police on a chase, and of the least politician unnecessarily. Simply simple, though is said in very simple terms. But, in reality those who are involved with the task in hand to complete don’t see that as simple. What is simple? Unsophisticated, crude, can be manipulated, one has good understanding of the mechanism of the thing---can be taken for sure. This could be as simple as an ant bite. The small swelling mark, saucer shaped reddish color with allergic reaction, irritating the skin and you knowingly have to scratch. When one asks, what has happen? You just point and answer---Ant. The word ant simply flashes a sequence of actions through the mind of the observer. The sound Oouch when it bites, scratching and burning sensation of the affected spot. The word ant also includes the action of the bite. The whole procedure is so simply simple.
Things that one is sure off, appears as simple to that individual. It could also mean that, anything that is guaranteed is simply simple. The only guarantee that life gives is ‘DEATH’, a very simple matter indeed. Death is an action causing transition of life to the other phase. It’s a completion of action at one end and the start at the other. So, simply simple. Simple is when a political leader commits nepotism and faces criticism. He says, one was to be employed and one has been employed. The worst is right of a rightful individual is deprived, a system is flouted, a law is violated and all his staffs swallow there moral stand. It’s that simple. It could also be a case of a single mother. She is desperately trying to get her child enrolled in the school. Society here does not question her action----but rules a decision for father’s name (some changes appear as glimpses on the far end of the tunnel). This could be understood to be a necessity requirement of the society to identify the blood line. It’s so simply simple. The blood line that is essential to identify your caste and clan. To provide privilege or deprive from one, to allow one to climb the ladder of success and tie down the other to hold that same ladder. A simple task. Or this could be the society’s way of enforcing identifiable man-woman relationship or simple society has made a decision of trusting the male members! This looks so simple.
Simple matters of daily life keeps us busy throughout the day. Strain of the job, threat of the boss, sharing of the colleagues and the responsibilities back home, is what makes life so simple and alive. To be alive you need to work really hard to make a living, this involves, shelter, clothing, food and providing for relationship, like wife, children’s, parents. That’s simple. So, it’s simply simple to be alive!
Ferdous H Khan
Simply simple-----could be heard amongst researchers on a project, students on coming examination, soldiers before the battle, police on a chase, and of the least politician unnecessarily. Simply simple, though is said in very simple terms. But, in reality those who are involved with the task in hand to complete don’t see that as simple. What is simple? Unsophisticated, crude, can be manipulated, one has good understanding of the mechanism of the thing---can be taken for sure. This could be as simple as an ant bite. The small swelling mark, saucer shaped reddish color with allergic reaction, irritating the skin and you knowingly have to scratch. When one asks, what has happen? You just point and answer---Ant. The word ant simply flashes a sequence of actions through the mind of the observer. The sound Oouch when it bites, scratching and burning sensation of the affected spot. The word ant also includes the action of the bite. The whole procedure is so simply simple.
Things that one is sure off, appears as simple to that individual. It could also mean that, anything that is guaranteed is simply simple. The only guarantee that life gives is ‘DEATH’, a very simple matter indeed. Death is an action causing transition of life to the other phase. It’s a completion of action at one end and the start at the other. So, simply simple. Simple is when a political leader commits nepotism and faces criticism. He says, one was to be employed and one has been employed. The worst is right of a rightful individual is deprived, a system is flouted, a law is violated and all his staffs swallow there moral stand. It’s that simple. It could also be a case of a single mother. She is desperately trying to get her child enrolled in the school. Society here does not question her action----but rules a decision for father’s name (some changes appear as glimpses on the far end of the tunnel). This could be understood to be a necessity requirement of the society to identify the blood line. It’s so simply simple. The blood line that is essential to identify your caste and clan. To provide privilege or deprive from one, to allow one to climb the ladder of success and tie down the other to hold that same ladder. A simple task. Or this could be the society’s way of enforcing identifiable man-woman relationship or simple society has made a decision of trusting the male members! This looks so simple.
Simple matters of daily life keeps us busy throughout the day. Strain of the job, threat of the boss, sharing of the colleagues and the responsibilities back home, is what makes life so simple and alive. To be alive you need to work really hard to make a living, this involves, shelter, clothing, food and providing for relationship, like wife, children’s, parents. That’s simple. So, it’s simply simple to be alive!
Wednesday, June 07, 2006
Leading Question?
Leading Question?
Ferdous H Khan
No Leading Question, this is observed as a principle in interrogation of an accused or from the potential source for information. Leading question is the theme of Journalism, to extract information. These two opposite ways for seeking information may look weird, but both have a purpose—to extract the truth.
In the first instance of ‘No Leading Question’, the information is sought after filtering off all the available happenings in relation to the particular case. Filtration is done to separate facts from fiction. In this case the common platform for the interrogation is, the accused got time to concoct a lethal mixture of truth and lies and a well laid out plan. This could happen when he came out of the shock of being detected. The body and the evil brain gears up its defensive measure. The accused to smoke in his crime, relates necessary and unnecessary incidents with the issue. He desperately tries to fog the real happenings—seeking to establish a safe alibi. He creates a front with mapped out routes pointing towards a safe exit. The technique adopted by the interrogators is to throw in circulation measures to blow the fog and discover the truth. The circulation is achieved by checking and counters checking on the story. In this way the laid trap made by the accused can be avoided, truth is unfolded and justice is done.
In the second case of ‘Leading Question’, the prevalent norms within the Journalist community. Dear readers at this stage you may feel that journalists are giving in to the trap of the initiator of the incident. It could be true, but this may also be kept in mind, that the reporters are on the spot usually within a very short time. In these circumstances, the best possible art could be to shoot a question in relation to the incident straight. In this case the initiator of the incident did not get time to concoct the lethal mixture. A straight leading question digs deep in and extracts fumbled answers, usually truth. However, the journalist uncovering the truth should broadcast the story as it unfolds. It could be in sequence or may not be. However, to sequence the case is to draw attention to a conclusion as viewed by the reporter. In this case repeated broadcasting also does the same evil—gets the viewers biased. Some may even take strong views of the issue thus depriving the individual of a fair trial, justice could be denied. This may be reversed for the first case – where related facts should be sequenced to come to a logical decision, sorted from the fog of incident. So, basically in time and off time case dealing art, both trying to unveil the truth.
Ferdous H Khan
No Leading Question, this is observed as a principle in interrogation of an accused or from the potential source for information. Leading question is the theme of Journalism, to extract information. These two opposite ways for seeking information may look weird, but both have a purpose—to extract the truth.
In the first instance of ‘No Leading Question’, the information is sought after filtering off all the available happenings in relation to the particular case. Filtration is done to separate facts from fiction. In this case the common platform for the interrogation is, the accused got time to concoct a lethal mixture of truth and lies and a well laid out plan. This could happen when he came out of the shock of being detected. The body and the evil brain gears up its defensive measure. The accused to smoke in his crime, relates necessary and unnecessary incidents with the issue. He desperately tries to fog the real happenings—seeking to establish a safe alibi. He creates a front with mapped out routes pointing towards a safe exit. The technique adopted by the interrogators is to throw in circulation measures to blow the fog and discover the truth. The circulation is achieved by checking and counters checking on the story. In this way the laid trap made by the accused can be avoided, truth is unfolded and justice is done.
In the second case of ‘Leading Question’, the prevalent norms within the Journalist community. Dear readers at this stage you may feel that journalists are giving in to the trap of the initiator of the incident. It could be true, but this may also be kept in mind, that the reporters are on the spot usually within a very short time. In these circumstances, the best possible art could be to shoot a question in relation to the incident straight. In this case the initiator of the incident did not get time to concoct the lethal mixture. A straight leading question digs deep in and extracts fumbled answers, usually truth. However, the journalist uncovering the truth should broadcast the story as it unfolds. It could be in sequence or may not be. However, to sequence the case is to draw attention to a conclusion as viewed by the reporter. In this case repeated broadcasting also does the same evil—gets the viewers biased. Some may even take strong views of the issue thus depriving the individual of a fair trial, justice could be denied. This may be reversed for the first case – where related facts should be sequenced to come to a logical decision, sorted from the fog of incident. So, basically in time and off time case dealing art, both trying to unveil the truth.
Saturday, June 03, 2006
Loyalty Catch
Loyalty Catch
Ferdous H Khan
Loyalty often used term in the circle of politics and in organizational set up. It means adherence to the norms and procedure laid out to complete a given task. Though, loyalty in politics and in an organization may differ in its basic meaning. But the general sense would remain the same. In the political arena loyalty is related to individuals’ personal attachment on principle basis. It could also mean that one must take the other as unquestioned leader. Should obey in execution of a task, must not ask questions and should not talk to media or other members of the group. It is that strict code of life that one has to stake his life to prove his or her loyalty. It not only means personal attention to the leader, it is in thought as well. Loyalty also could mean to give unbiased assessment. To bring to the notice what no others have brought for the decision making process. It also should be understood, a loyal person in this case – if taken positively has the responsibility to express happenings to the leader in positive terms in relation to the would be decision. It remains the prerogative of the leader to accept or reject the notion. But it remains my obligation. This is loyalty. Loyalty is also related to trust. One would tend to believe that the other would maintain silence on an issue until resolved. The feeling of one’s rear is guarded in presence of the other is the loyalty. This also brings in the faith and believes. To have faith, is to trust to believe in, in summary to rely! Synopsis loyalty. This realm is not only related to political society, but has to manifest in the areas where leader and led situation exists.
Organizational loyalty relates to the generic sense of adhering to the laws and norms of the system. Going through the procedure of the work. To maintain the ways of working as has been handed over to the worker. Here loyalty works in groups. This is in relation to the working atmosphere, and to the assigned task. This loyalty is directly proportional to personal development, in position, finance and authority. It seeks to act and work to achieve power and authority. As discussed it revolves around the group philosophy. Advancement of the group—means own advancement. As an example, a seller advertising and vouching on the authenticity and price of the product is in the interest of the organization—not the buyer. More products are sold, more flow of finance, making more bonus available in the end of the month for all. The penalty is paid here by the buyer. In general sense a seller should remain loyal towards the customer or the buyer. However, this is never the case. In such cases there is absence of believe and trust. The sense of not being cheated does not exist here. Customer invariably feels cheated either on quality or on price. In this case of loyalty the situation of leader and led does not exist. Here, live and let live is the order of the day.
Ferdous H Khan
Loyalty often used term in the circle of politics and in organizational set up. It means adherence to the norms and procedure laid out to complete a given task. Though, loyalty in politics and in an organization may differ in its basic meaning. But the general sense would remain the same. In the political arena loyalty is related to individuals’ personal attachment on principle basis. It could also mean that one must take the other as unquestioned leader. Should obey in execution of a task, must not ask questions and should not talk to media or other members of the group. It is that strict code of life that one has to stake his life to prove his or her loyalty. It not only means personal attention to the leader, it is in thought as well. Loyalty also could mean to give unbiased assessment. To bring to the notice what no others have brought for the decision making process. It also should be understood, a loyal person in this case – if taken positively has the responsibility to express happenings to the leader in positive terms in relation to the would be decision. It remains the prerogative of the leader to accept or reject the notion. But it remains my obligation. This is loyalty. Loyalty is also related to trust. One would tend to believe that the other would maintain silence on an issue until resolved. The feeling of one’s rear is guarded in presence of the other is the loyalty. This also brings in the faith and believes. To have faith, is to trust to believe in, in summary to rely! Synopsis loyalty. This realm is not only related to political society, but has to manifest in the areas where leader and led situation exists.
Organizational loyalty relates to the generic sense of adhering to the laws and norms of the system. Going through the procedure of the work. To maintain the ways of working as has been handed over to the worker. Here loyalty works in groups. This is in relation to the working atmosphere, and to the assigned task. This loyalty is directly proportional to personal development, in position, finance and authority. It seeks to act and work to achieve power and authority. As discussed it revolves around the group philosophy. Advancement of the group—means own advancement. As an example, a seller advertising and vouching on the authenticity and price of the product is in the interest of the organization—not the buyer. More products are sold, more flow of finance, making more bonus available in the end of the month for all. The penalty is paid here by the buyer. In general sense a seller should remain loyal towards the customer or the buyer. However, this is never the case. In such cases there is absence of believe and trust. The sense of not being cheated does not exist here. Customer invariably feels cheated either on quality or on price. In this case of loyalty the situation of leader and led does not exist. Here, live and let live is the order of the day.
Friday, June 02, 2006
Where are we Corrupt then???
Where are we Corrupt then???
Ferdous H Khan
Corruption—A highly saleable word under all governments. People are accustomed hearing this term in there day to day conversations. General masses do not react by raising eye brows, as if something untouchable has occurred. Masses have even forgotten to ascribe it as a crime of the society. It has been taken as a way of life within our society. A whole some encompassing term. The term has been related specifically with the third world countries. It for that does not mean that the first and the second worlds do not have this in there society. In all societies masses feel the affect of corruption in different magnitude. The affect can be felt from the highest authority to the end destination-grave. It’s survival solely depends on the scarcity of resource, manipulation of law and disrespect for others. To deal with this situation great Organizations have come up to do profitable business on the issue. They intend to circulate the meaning of this term, discuss it’s evil affect and consequences at individual level. The business starts with allotment of funds, expenditure in travel and allowances, claiming compensation for the time spent to collate and assess measures to grade countries and governments.
The other groups in the race arrange for seminars to discuss on the modalities to fight this evil-corruption. These groups spend days together from morning to night—discussing on the issue to go to it’s roots. Now to bell the cat is the issue, meaning curing through the roots. For plant Kingdome root means base. Labyrinth of roots providing food and nourishment to the body. Provides strong foot hold, to withstand winds and storms, floods and rain. In a system of corruption which means opposite to what root means in the plant kingdom. Moreover, in this case root means the head –up to down and the natures way—down to up. Therefore to tag root in such case as root cause is inappropriate and improper. Now dear readers, to deal with any cure for the system you have to have proper weapon to deal with. It could me physical, theoretical, medication or systematic approach. Without identifying proper weapon, call for fight, is only making gesture without hoping for the result. Then in this case the call for fight issued by the seminar or organization are only intentions against the system which remains encapsuled in time.
Others come down heavily on dealing with corruption—system change is there ‘war cry’. The demands reverberates throughout the forum. We all give voice to the cry, by the way, what do you think this could mean? What is the system? What changes are we expecting within the running system? For the sake of discussion let’s proceed with a generic official procedure. The process starts with an initiator, who is essential to initiate an issue for resolve. He submits his request in writing to the concerned office. The received request now needs to be registered and sorted basing on the subject matter. This phase is the lowest strata of decision process. We must keep in mind here, that a major activity is going to take place—which will decide it’s future course of action. In this stage the concerned officer to deal with the request is selected. Tragedy unfolds now, because to process the case an input is necessary in relation to the existing policy on the issue. Here the most important individual is the clerk, having specialized for a long period in the same office. His ways of putting in perspective will matter in drawing result positively or negatively. The officer being often rotated to adhere to the policy of fixed period posting. The officer with a colorful towel thrown over the synthetic upholstered revolving and swiveling chair gives him an aura of pseudo ego of all knowing. Do you have any idea why officers spread towels on the back of their chairs? It’s like throwing in towel during boxing bout by the coach—sign of surrender. Now the signature of the officer on the note forwarded by the clerk validates it for the next stage processing.
The clerk now grabs the opportunity and requests the initiator to arrange “speedup system” resources. A good move indeed, because we still have the colonial British system of functioning. Initiator should not see the British officer in person, buffer was in place to give the British officer an atmosphere of demi-god like. In this particular case also, direct access to the officer may cause “SARKAR BAHADUR”-the officer, to negate the whole effort. A disaster for all the effort made so far-not worth it. Instead the initiator grease the clerk for activating the system for “speed move of the request”. The concions of the clerk is clear. The grease is his rightful due. He has put in his experience and knowledge behind this whole effort. A thinking akin to an intellectual. We are still in the stage of the clerk and junior officer. The process is ripe now to move across the corridor to another building and the guy responsible for this activity is PEON (authorize carrier of the document).
This guy, the authorize carrier thinks that the initiator is going to make much gain out of it. Therefore, he feels that he has some right of privilege associated with it. Till now did we come across any corrupt practices? It’s in the way of thinking more then in reality. The project has had all experience of travel and have ultimately reached the second height level before finally getting the sanction seal. This stage is for bargaining—here the value of the project and the fund available in this particular head is tallied. The initiator has to now recast some of the endorsement in the original document. This effort to the initiator is perfectly within the norm, as he needs his sanction. To the officer or bargainer at this stage it’s right, as the particular head has an allotted amount which is more then what is need to complete the task. More over due to observation in the early stages of this paper much time was lost. Now we are nearing the end of a fiscal year. It would be difficult to return the money. If, returned then in the coming year we may be deprived of this allotment, how would this office benefit? Such serious question initiates more queries then it answers. The gentleman therefore, has no other option but to bag the surplus amount of this project.
As the fund will be drawn by the initiator. It is his responsibility to pay the amount to the bargainer for reimbursement in the chain. The amount being huge, and likely to be played in any sting operations. Thus, the cash is absorbed into denominations of green bucks from the black market. A genuine pro nationalist behavior. He can be called a true nationalist for bringing green buck in circulation in international accounts. This also symbolizes progress?? Would you call this corruption? Such a great success calls for celebration, the celebration is to celebrate the bonding of the new chain in the system. The whole process has brought the friendly bond of peon to the boss in harmony. This would require no further fine tuning. The work efficiency will increase in the days ahead. The family members of the chain can enjoy holidays in dream land and the bosses can connive to get involved in another set of operations
So we can now defend in saying that all the process involved from discussion, seminars, system change cry and the creation of the chain of efficiency is all for efficiency. Where are we corrupt then?????
Ferdous H Khan
Corruption—A highly saleable word under all governments. People are accustomed hearing this term in there day to day conversations. General masses do not react by raising eye brows, as if something untouchable has occurred. Masses have even forgotten to ascribe it as a crime of the society. It has been taken as a way of life within our society. A whole some encompassing term. The term has been related specifically with the third world countries. It for that does not mean that the first and the second worlds do not have this in there society. In all societies masses feel the affect of corruption in different magnitude. The affect can be felt from the highest authority to the end destination-grave. It’s survival solely depends on the scarcity of resource, manipulation of law and disrespect for others. To deal with this situation great Organizations have come up to do profitable business on the issue. They intend to circulate the meaning of this term, discuss it’s evil affect and consequences at individual level. The business starts with allotment of funds, expenditure in travel and allowances, claiming compensation for the time spent to collate and assess measures to grade countries and governments.
The other groups in the race arrange for seminars to discuss on the modalities to fight this evil-corruption. These groups spend days together from morning to night—discussing on the issue to go to it’s roots. Now to bell the cat is the issue, meaning curing through the roots. For plant Kingdome root means base. Labyrinth of roots providing food and nourishment to the body. Provides strong foot hold, to withstand winds and storms, floods and rain. In a system of corruption which means opposite to what root means in the plant kingdom. Moreover, in this case root means the head –up to down and the natures way—down to up. Therefore to tag root in such case as root cause is inappropriate and improper. Now dear readers, to deal with any cure for the system you have to have proper weapon to deal with. It could me physical, theoretical, medication or systematic approach. Without identifying proper weapon, call for fight, is only making gesture without hoping for the result. Then in this case the call for fight issued by the seminar or organization are only intentions against the system which remains encapsuled in time.
Others come down heavily on dealing with corruption—system change is there ‘war cry’. The demands reverberates throughout the forum. We all give voice to the cry, by the way, what do you think this could mean? What is the system? What changes are we expecting within the running system? For the sake of discussion let’s proceed with a generic official procedure. The process starts with an initiator, who is essential to initiate an issue for resolve. He submits his request in writing to the concerned office. The received request now needs to be registered and sorted basing on the subject matter. This phase is the lowest strata of decision process. We must keep in mind here, that a major activity is going to take place—which will decide it’s future course of action. In this stage the concerned officer to deal with the request is selected. Tragedy unfolds now, because to process the case an input is necessary in relation to the existing policy on the issue. Here the most important individual is the clerk, having specialized for a long period in the same office. His ways of putting in perspective will matter in drawing result positively or negatively. The officer being often rotated to adhere to the policy of fixed period posting. The officer with a colorful towel thrown over the synthetic upholstered revolving and swiveling chair gives him an aura of pseudo ego of all knowing. Do you have any idea why officers spread towels on the back of their chairs? It’s like throwing in towel during boxing bout by the coach—sign of surrender. Now the signature of the officer on the note forwarded by the clerk validates it for the next stage processing.
The clerk now grabs the opportunity and requests the initiator to arrange “speedup system” resources. A good move indeed, because we still have the colonial British system of functioning. Initiator should not see the British officer in person, buffer was in place to give the British officer an atmosphere of demi-god like. In this particular case also, direct access to the officer may cause “SARKAR BAHADUR”-the officer, to negate the whole effort. A disaster for all the effort made so far-not worth it. Instead the initiator grease the clerk for activating the system for “speed move of the request”. The concions of the clerk is clear. The grease is his rightful due. He has put in his experience and knowledge behind this whole effort. A thinking akin to an intellectual. We are still in the stage of the clerk and junior officer. The process is ripe now to move across the corridor to another building and the guy responsible for this activity is PEON (authorize carrier of the document).
This guy, the authorize carrier thinks that the initiator is going to make much gain out of it. Therefore, he feels that he has some right of privilege associated with it. Till now did we come across any corrupt practices? It’s in the way of thinking more then in reality. The project has had all experience of travel and have ultimately reached the second height level before finally getting the sanction seal. This stage is for bargaining—here the value of the project and the fund available in this particular head is tallied. The initiator has to now recast some of the endorsement in the original document. This effort to the initiator is perfectly within the norm, as he needs his sanction. To the officer or bargainer at this stage it’s right, as the particular head has an allotted amount which is more then what is need to complete the task. More over due to observation in the early stages of this paper much time was lost. Now we are nearing the end of a fiscal year. It would be difficult to return the money. If, returned then in the coming year we may be deprived of this allotment, how would this office benefit? Such serious question initiates more queries then it answers. The gentleman therefore, has no other option but to bag the surplus amount of this project.
As the fund will be drawn by the initiator. It is his responsibility to pay the amount to the bargainer for reimbursement in the chain. The amount being huge, and likely to be played in any sting operations. Thus, the cash is absorbed into denominations of green bucks from the black market. A genuine pro nationalist behavior. He can be called a true nationalist for bringing green buck in circulation in international accounts. This also symbolizes progress?? Would you call this corruption? Such a great success calls for celebration, the celebration is to celebrate the bonding of the new chain in the system. The whole process has brought the friendly bond of peon to the boss in harmony. This would require no further fine tuning. The work efficiency will increase in the days ahead. The family members of the chain can enjoy holidays in dream land and the bosses can connive to get involved in another set of operations
So we can now defend in saying that all the process involved from discussion, seminars, system change cry and the creation of the chain of efficiency is all for efficiency. Where are we corrupt then?????
Thursday, June 01, 2006
Life's Play
Life’s Play
Ferdous H Khan
Life’s Play---Life often plays games with you. You have to know the time and sequence of the game played. It could start at any moment without your knowledge. You must be very relaxed and looking for a lovely time with your family. To make the situation a memorable one you also invites few friends. Your wife comes and for nothing blames you to have not informed her and consulted the guest list. You are now singled out as an individual with self interest. You are tagged to have an affair with one of the invites, who happens to be close friend. Wives have never handled this part of their husband’s life with softness and understanding. Rather this side gave birth to the violent side of your wife. The women in life cannot comprehend that a situation of such friend ship can exist. May be there is a chemical signal initiation at both end i.e. ladies. Wife feels why husband has to have sympathy from another woman as a friend---she feels that the association is bonding into male female affair. Her logic sees another woman as a challenger in the system of natural law. When eye contact between the wife and your friend happens, the language of sight for both do not obey the same laws. Wife feels that the other woman is saying—I have your husband at the end of string and I can play at my leisure. Where as wife’s eye signals please leave my man. Therefore, wife has reason to feel humiliated and rejected. This will surely give rise to tornado within. This special human condition between man and woman must be understood by the man.
Ferdous H Khan
Life’s Play---Life often plays games with you. You have to know the time and sequence of the game played. It could start at any moment without your knowledge. You must be very relaxed and looking for a lovely time with your family. To make the situation a memorable one you also invites few friends. Your wife comes and for nothing blames you to have not informed her and consulted the guest list. You are now singled out as an individual with self interest. You are tagged to have an affair with one of the invites, who happens to be close friend. Wives have never handled this part of their husband’s life with softness and understanding. Rather this side gave birth to the violent side of your wife. The women in life cannot comprehend that a situation of such friend ship can exist. May be there is a chemical signal initiation at both end i.e. ladies. Wife feels why husband has to have sympathy from another woman as a friend---she feels that the association is bonding into male female affair. Her logic sees another woman as a challenger in the system of natural law. When eye contact between the wife and your friend happens, the language of sight for both do not obey the same laws. Wife feels that the other woman is saying—I have your husband at the end of string and I can play at my leisure. Where as wife’s eye signals please leave my man. Therefore, wife has reason to feel humiliated and rejected. This will surely give rise to tornado within. This special human condition between man and woman must be understood by the man.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)